authorityresearch.com

How To Turn A Conservative Into A Liberal.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

When it comes to deciding what to do in any given situation, doing right and not wrong, by moving communication away from discussion, which requires all participants to suspend, as upon a cross their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do or be right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will—making the father's/Father's authority right and "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating wrong, engendering a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating—toward dialogue, which requires all participants to suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth, i.e., the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way of their carnal desires, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or the people are stimulating, in order (as in "new" world order) for everyone to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience—making "lust" right and the father's/Father's authority wrong thereby negating the guilt conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in the process, which is the main objective, i.e., the intended outcome—a conservative is turned into a liberal. The father's/Father's authority is initiated and sustained in discussion. In dialogue, the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating is initiated and sustained.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words, for Karl Marx, et al., it is "lust" that "reconciles you (the Karl Marx in you) to the world."

"the central problem is to change reality.… reality with its 'obedience to laws.'" "The dialectical method was overthrown—the parts [the children] were prevented from finding their definition within the whole [within "the group"] [dialogue, i.e., the child's carnal desires were inhibited or blocked by discussion, i.e., the father's/Fathers' authority]." (György Lukács, History & Class Consciousness: What is Orthodox Marxism?)

According to Karl Marx, et al., if man is to be "reconciled" to his "self" and to the world, i.e., to the current situation and/or people that stimulate pleasure ("lust") in him, i.e., if man is to overcome "repression," i.e., overcome having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates and overcome "alienation," i.e., overcome being separated from one another, i.e., prevented from finding common ground with those of common thought and action ("theory and practice")—"lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—the father's/Father's authority must be negated., i.e., discussion (the father's/Father's authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth) must be replaced with dialogue (the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," i.e., "sense experience") when it comes to "knowing" right from wrong.

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:'" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

There is no father's/Father's authority in an opinion, in dialogue, or in the consensus process (which are the three attributes of the French Revolution, "Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité"), there is only the individual's/child's carnal desires, i.e., "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. In dialogue you become God, i.e., a god amongst gods. By moving communication, dealing with right and wrong away from discussion, which sustains the father's/Father's authority to dialogue, which negates it, the person is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority system, so he, along with all participates can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating).

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways, the objective however, is change." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #11)

All children are "philosophers," 1) dissatisfied with how the world "Is," where they, having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are subject to their parent's authority, not being able to do what they want when they want, 2) thinking (dialoguing with their "self") aka imagining how the world "Ought" to be, where they can do what they want, when the want, and 3) how it "Can" be once the father's/Father's authority is no longer in their way.

"The peasantry constantly regenerates the bourgeoisie [the father's/Father's authority system]—in positively every sphere of activity and life." "We must learn how to eradicate all bourgeois habits, customs, and traditions everywhere." (Vladimir Lenin, Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder An Essential Condition of the Bolsheviks' Success May 12, 1920)

The problem, according to Karl Marx, et, al, is that once children grow up and have children of their own they tell (force) their children to do right and not wrong according to their established commands, rules, facts, and truth, telling them what they can and can not do, "Because I said so," i.e., "It is written" getting in their way, i.e., preventing them from "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., preventing them from being (becoming) their "self," i.e., preventing 'change.' Only by killing the father's outright (traditional Marxism, which sustained the father's/Father's authority in society, i.e., "Do it my way or else," yet allowed no public discussion) or by 'creating' a world of dialogue (transformational Marxism, which negates the father's/Father's authority, i.e., discussion in the child's thoughts and actions) the child (out of his fear of being judged, chastened, condemned, and/or cast out, i.e., retaining discussion, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth in this communication with his "self") will only be able to privately dialogue within (with) his "self" his love of pleasure and hate of restraint, remaining forever "repressed" by the father's/Father's authority system—since he is not strong enough by his "self' to overthrow the father/Father and his/His authority system in his thoughts.

"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." "The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs [the replacing of discussion, i.e., the father's/Father's authority with dialogue, i.e., the child's carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in order to "know" right from wrong] by accepting belongingness to the group." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

The dynamics of "the group" ("group dynamics"), i.e., the person's desire ("lust") for "the groups" approval (affirming his carnal desires) has a direct effect upon his thinking and acting. This is why the Lord, Jesus Christ, stated that you must not only "deny your self," i.e., your "lusts" but also "pick up your cross," i.e., be willing to endure the rejection of others for not affirming their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, in order to follow him, doing the Father's will.

"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26

Doing it in "the group," in order to arrive at a consensus makes it where everyone can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating with affirmation—approving or "tolerating," i.e., identifying with everyone's carnal nature, i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating.

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., our "lust of the flesh," "lust of the eyes," and our "pride of life" before one another, making all that "is," subject to that which is "of the world" only.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart establishes the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Your heart is "desperately wicked" in that it hates restraint, i.e., hates the father's/Father's authority for "getting in the way," i.e. for preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates. You can not see your hate of restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "lust," i.e., your "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug your "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., your "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward the father/Father (and those who have faith in and obey him/Him), who is preventing or trying to prevent you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—as being "wicked," making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain pleasure, keep pleasure, or get pleasure back, which includes the praises (affirmation, i.e., 'justification') of men, with you removing or attempting to remove anyone who is getting in the way. No matter how much you try to 'justify' your "self" before men, seeking after and getting men's approval (affirmation), i.e., pleasing men you can not be or become "good." Only God is good. The only way you can become "good" in your eyes (and in the eyes of others) is to 'justify' your "self" (and their "self"), i.e., your "lust" (and their "lust") for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, becoming God your "self" (making them God as well), determining right from wrong, good from evil according to your (and their) carnal nature, i.e., from your (and their) own "self," i.e., from your (and their) "sensuous needs" ("the lust of the flesh") and your (and their) "sense perception" ("the lust of the eyes"), i.e., from your (and their) "sense experiences" of this life ("the pride of life"), with pleasure being "right" and restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, getting in the way of pleasure being "wrong." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)

The "culture war" is all about negating discussion, i.e., the father's/Father's authority when it comes to right and wrong so dialogue, i.e., the child's carnal nature, i.e., "lust," i.e., those who advocate it over and therefore against the father's/Father's authority can rule over the world, i.e., the home, the classroom, the "community," the workplace, the police, the military, the media, entertainment, the government, the "church," i.e., "the people," negating anyone who gets in the way—including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous—without having a guilty conscience.

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

How to turn a conservative child into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., "group grade" classroom, turning him against his parent's authority. The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority (in order to be or become a part of "the group"). Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure ("lusts") and hate of restrain (dissatisfaction with, resentment toward, hatred of the father's/Father's authority), doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. Placing a child in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus classroom reveals his way of thinking, with the conservative child resisting the process—insisting upon preaching commands and rules to be obeyed as given, teaching facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and attempting to discuss any command, rule, fact, and truth that is being questioned, challenged, defied, disregarded, attacked in order for "the group" to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—and the liberal child instantly joining in—martyring the conservative child. Being "open-ended," i.e., "non-judgmental," i.e., "positive" makes all students judgmental of the student who holds them accountable and judges them according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., upon that which is "negative" to the flesh. By joining in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process the child/student is progressively moved from conservatism to liberalism in his thinking and in his actions—questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking authority. (see "Group Dynamics," "Force Field Analysis," and "Unfreezing, Moving, and Refreezing" by Kurt Lewin)

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)

"A change in the curriculum is a change in the people concerned—in teachers, in students, in parents ....." "Curriculum change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." "... people involved who were loyal to the older pattern must be helped to transfer their allegiance to the new." "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs of an individual or a group." (Benne)

How to turn a conservative teacher into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., "team building," "group think" college classroom and in-serve teacher training, learning how to apply "Bloom's Taxonomies" in the classroom, turning him against the parent's authority over their children.

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Rogers, on becoming a person) In this way, i.e. through therapy "self" is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority (system).

How to turn a conservative spouse/child into a liberal. Have him/her participate in a dialoguing of opinions to a consensus counseling session, turning him/her against the husband's/father's authority in the home, making it all about satisfying their carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. By focusing upon the family, i.e., "human relations" the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the traditional, middle-class family is negated.

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost [with "lust" superseding (negating) the father's/Father's authority]." (Abraham Maslow, The Farther Reaches of Human Nature)

How to turn a conservative citizen into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus town-hall, school board, workplace, "community" meeting, turning him against local control, i.e., the citizen's/individual's authority, under God, i.e., "private convictions" over their family, property and business.

"[We] must develop persons who see non-influencability [non-manipulability] of private convictions in joint deliberations as a vice rather than a virtue." (Benne)

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making [replacing discussion with dialogue—in a discussion you persuade and are being persuaded with facts and truth, while in dialogue you manipulate and are being manipulated through "feelings"], our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

How to turn a conservative legislator into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., "bipartisanship" meetings, turning him against his constituent's authority, i.e., the constitution which limits his power of authority.

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves." Matthew 7:15

How to turn a conservative minister into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus minister's conference (and seminary), turning him against the authority of God's Word and believers, "encouraging" the congregation to dialogue, i.e., to share their opinion of God's Word instead, making it subject to men's opinions instead of preaching, teaching, and discussing it, i.e., accepting it as is, by faith—with everyong doing the Father's will.

"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God." 2 Thessalonians 2:3, 4

"And truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 3:1

How to turn a conservative believer into a liberal. Have him participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus, i.e., the contemporary youth group, bible study, turning him against the authority of God's Word and those who abide by it. Fellowship is based upon the preaching of God's Word, accepting it as "IS." The apostate "church" dialogues men's opinions of it in order to come to a consensus, i.e., to "build relationships based upon common self interests" so it can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people stimulate, without having a guilty conscience—with men's affirmation.

"To identify with more and more of the world, moving toward the ultimate of mysticism, a fusion with the world, or peak experience, cosmic consciousness, etc." (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

"The person at the peak experience is godlike . . . complete, loving, uncondemning, compassionate and accept[ing] of the world and of the person." (Abraham Maslow Toward a Psychology of Being)

"In self-actualizing people, the work they do might be better be called 'mission,' 'calling,' 'duty,' 'vocation,' in the priest's sense." "Meaningful work comes very close to the religious quest in the humanistic sense." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, you are a god amongst gods, following after the facilitator of 'change' who is "helping" you 'justify' your "self," i.e., your "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, so he can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience—with "the people's," i.e., your affirmation.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020